Shruti Haasan v. Mahalaxmi Arts: Bombay HC Issues AI John Doe Order
The Bombay HC in Shruti Haasan v. Mahalaxmi Arts has issued a landmark John Doe injunction protecting personality rights against unauthorized AI-generated content.
Browse the archive
The Bombay HC in Shruti Haasan v. Mahalaxmi Arts has issued a landmark John Doe injunction protecting personality rights against unauthorized AI-generated content.
The Madras High Court ruled that an interim injunction cannot be granted in copyright disputes where the chain of title is contested and plagued by rival claims.
The Delhi High Court has set aside a patent refusal, ruling that the Controller cannot consolidate Section 14 examination rights with Section 25 opposition hearings.
The Delhi High Court in Hindustan Unilever v. Kwick Living settles territorial jurisdiction by leveraging defendant admissions, ensuring expedited interim relief adjudication.
The Delhi High Court in Vikrant Kapoor v. Anuj Kohli ruled that naming a specific forum in invoices effectively ousts other courts, even without 'exclusive' language.
The Madras High Court in Screen Scene Media v. Dr. S. Venkatesh affirmed an interim injunction, ruling that cinematograph film ownership requires clear chain of title.
The Madras High Court in Eros Technologies Digital FZE v. Ayngaran International Films rules that Section 55 copyright infringement claims override private arbitration clauses.
The Bombay High Court has granted Asian Paints an ex-parte ad-interim injunction against Deepak Kumar Panwar, affirming protection for its 'APEX' trade dress and marks.
The August 2026 Indian IP law digest highlights a landmark Delhi High Court seven-step test for Section 3(m) patentability and key rulings on trademark well-known marks.
Stephen Thaler DABUS Case Analysis: The Registrar of Copyrights has formally rejected Dr. Stephen Thaler's application naming AI system DABUS as author of 'A Recent Entrance To Paradise', ruling that statutory authorship under the Copyright Act 1957 requires a human creator.