Madras HC Dismisses Patent Appeal: Expiry Renders Monopoly Moot
The Madras High Court dismissed an appeal regarding a patent refusal, ruling it infructuous as the statutory twenty-year term under Section 53 had already elapsed.
Browse the archive
The Madras High Court dismissed an appeal regarding a patent refusal, ruling it infructuous as the statutory twenty-year term under Section 53 had already elapsed.
An analysis of Section 3(j) of the Patents Act 1970, exploring biological patent exclusions, the Supreme Court Monsanto v. Nuziveedu ruling, and plant variety rights under the PPV&FR Act.
The Madras HC set aside a patent refusal for Aventose Energy, ruling that the Controller's rejection lacked granular comparative analysis of the claimed invention.
The Madras High Court set aside a patent refusal, ruling that the Controller's use of 'hindsight mosaicing' of prior art failed to negate the invention's novelty.
An analysis of the strategic tension between patent protection and trade secrets in India, examining reverse engineering risks, TRIPS Article 39, confidentiality clubs, and the Draft Trade Secrets Bill 2024.
The Calcutta High Court granted an interim injunction restraining Finorchem from manufacturing 4-ADPA, reinforcing the burden of proof shift under Section 104A.
An analysis of the India-Brazil TKDL access agreement between CSIR and INPI Brazil, exploring defensive patent protection, anti-biopiracy diplomacy, and South-South intellectual property cooperation.
Madras HC restores patent application deemed abandoned u/s 21(1) of the Patents Act, 1970 in Deakin University v Controller of Patents under Article 226.
The Madras High Court dismissed patent revocation challenges as infructuous after confirming that the underlying patent terms had expired, rendering the matter moot.
A doctrinal analysis of Section 3(k) of the Patents Act, examining Indian judicial and patent office guidelines on software and computer-related inventions.