Skip to content
Subscribe

Editorial Policy

Last Updated: September 2026

Its IP Time adheres to rigorous standards of accuracy, legal rigor, and transparency in reporting and analyzing Indian intellectual property law, statutory reforms, and commercial court jurisprudence.

1. Primary-Source Verification Standard

Every case brief, statutory primer, and weekly digest published on Its IP Time is grounded strictly in primary legal authorities. Our editorial workflow prohibits reliance on secondhand news reports, social media commentary, or unverified secondary summaries.

Our 5-stage verification methodology requires:

  1. Direct Judicial Order Review: We obtain and inspect official certified copies, neutral-citation judgments, and daily order sheets directly from official High Court registries (including the Delhi High Court Intellectual Property Division, Bombay High Court, Madras High Court, and Calcutta High Court) and the Supreme Court of India.
  2. Statutory Cross-Verification: Every statutory citation, sub-section reference, and amendment is verified against the official Bare Acts and Gazettes of India published by the Ministry of Commerce and Industry and the Ministry of Law and Justice.
  3. Registry Gazette Examination: Procedural timelines, trademark opposition updates, and patent examination rules are verified directly against the official journals and examination manuals issued by the Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks (CGPDTM).
  4. Independent Case Citation Tagging: All cases cited incorporate standardized neutral citations, official suit numbers, and bench particulars to enable readers to consult the authoritative judicial record.
  5. Human Peer Review: Every article undergoes final review by a qualified legal practitioner prior to publication.

2. Artificial Intelligence (AI) Policy & Human Oversight

Its IP Time maintains an explicit, transparent standard regarding the use of generative artificial intelligence:

  • Strict Human Authorship: All doctrinal arguments, case commentaries, statutory critiques, and legal assessments are conceived, researched, authored, and verified exclusively by qualified human legal practitioners.
  • Role of Algorithmic Tools: Algorithmic and software tools are utilized strictly for backend indexation, document layout, formatting, or generating non-substantive structural reading aids (such as collapsible navigation indices).
  • Zero Hallucination Tolerance: We strictly prohibit the publication of AI-generated case citations, automated case summaries, or unsupervised algorithmic text. Every judgment citation, statutory rule, and judicial quote is individually checked against court records.

3. Plagiarism & Originality Guarantee

Its IP Time is committed to 100% original legal scholarship:

  • We do not aggregate, scrape, or republish text from other legal blogs, court headnotes, or commercial databases.
  • Where judicial orders or statutory sections are quoted, they are clearly formatted as blockquotes with explicit citation to paragraph numbers of the official judgment.
  • Academic fair dealing exemptions under Section 52(1)(q) of the Copyright Act, 1957 (reproduction of judicial proceedings and legislative enactments) are strictly observed with appropriate attribution.

4. Editorial Independence & Conflict of Interest

Its IP Time operates with absolute editorial independence:

  • No Sponsored Legal Coverage: We do not publish paid case briefs, sponsored law firm reviews, or commercial litigant defenses.
  • Conflict Disclosure: If an author, editor, or contributor has acted as counsel, clerk, or researcher in any litigation or IPO proceeding discussed on this platform, prominent written disclosure of such representation is mandatorily appended to the article.
  • Objective Doctrinal Critique: Judicial orders are evaluated dispassionately on legal reasoning, statutory fidelity, and commercial practicality, regardless of the parties involved.

5. Corrections & Errata Policy

We are committed to immediate corrections whenever an error of fact, citation, or statutory interpretation occurs:

  1. Reporting Errors: Readers, advocates, or parties who identify an inaccuracy are requested to email editor@itsiptime.com with the subject line Editorial Correction Request, providing specific reference to the article URL and the corresponding certified court order or statutory Gazette.
  2. Investigation Timeline: All correction requests are reviewed within 24 hours.
  3. Public Transparency: When a substantive correction is made, an Editorial Correction Note is appended at the top or bottom of the article specifying the date of modification, the original error, and the corrected text. Minor typographical corrections are updated directly.

6. Non-Legal Advice Disclaimer

All content on Its IP Time is published solely for informational, academic, and professional discussion. It does not constitute formal legal counsel, statutory opinion, or an advocate-client relationship under the Advocates Act, 1961.