Browse every analysis published on Its IP Time.
The Madras HC refused to grant an interim injunction, holding that retail expansion under a unified GST registration does not violate a trademark litigation status quo order.
A detailed legal review of modern copyright boundaries and statutory protections in contemporary Indian digital media.
Examining the judicial balance between trade secret protection and post-employment mobility under Indian contract and intellectual property jurisprudence.
An in-depth analysis of the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act and its statutory decriminalisation of minor procedural offences across Indian IP legislation.
The Madras High Court disposed of a trademark infringement and passing off suit in Texmo Industries v. Gayatri Industries after recording a joint compromise memo over the mark 'ATARO PUMPS' in relation to 'TARO'.
The Bombay High Court granted an ex-parte ad-interim injunction restraining AI platforms, merchandisers, and unauthorized domain holders from cloning Arijit Singh's voice, name, and likeness without authorization.
The Madras High Court in Ashique Exports v. Koyenco Soaps reaffirmed that established trade dress and long-term usage provide robust protection against deceptive imitation in the FMCG sector.
The Madras High Court ruled that phonetic similarity in consumer goods triggers immediate trademark infringement, restraining 'MYSOAP' for mimicking the registered mark 'MYSOP'.
Does the Commercial Courts Act override the trademark forum requirements under Section 134? The Supreme Court referred this critical jurisdictional conflict to a larger bench.
<p>Step-by-step guide to Customs IP recordal in India via the ICER portal. Learn mandatory documentation, indemnity bonds, IPR Enforcement Rules 2007, and how to block infringing imports at Indian ports.</p>
Explore this week's key Indian IP updates, featuring crucial trademark rulings from the Delhi, Bombay, and Calcutta High Courts alongside major DPIIT and GI Registry developments.
Calcutta High Court issues partial injunction in Pravin Kumar v. ITC Limited, clarifying the evidentiary threshold for trade dress infringement and passing off claims.
