Weekly IP Digest
Weekly Indian IP Law Digest Oct 25 to 31 2026 | Its IP Time
Weekly Indian IP Law Digest reviewing mandatory evidence timelines under Rule 45, patent term expiry under Section 53, and key High Court trademark injunctions.
Latest Analyses
Browse every analysis published on Its IP Time.
trademark
Delhi HC Restrains ‘VEEPRO’ Mark for Infringing ‘WIPRO’ Trademark
The Delhi High Court has issued a permanent injunction against VEEPRO Lights, ruling that the mark deceptively infringes upon Wipro Enterprises' registered mark.
trademark
Delhi High Court Restores ‘KEI-KUMAR EQUIPMENT INDIA’ Trademark
The Delhi High Court set aside a trademark review order restoring 'KEI-KUMAR EQUIPMENT INDIA', holding Rule 45 abandonment mandatory and immune to advocate negligence claims.
patent
Madras HC Dismisses Patent Appeal: Expiry Renders Monopoly Moot
The Madras High Court dismissed an appeal regarding a patent refusal, ruling it infructuous as the statutory twenty-year term under Section 53 had already elapsed.
trademark
Madras HC Restrains ‘SANGETHAS’ Mark in ‘SANGEETHA’ Restaurant Dispute
The Madras HC has granted an interim injunction against the use of 'SANGETHAS' for restaurants, establishing the 'hungry consumer' test for trademark infringement.
trademark
E.I. du Pont Trademark Battle: Madras HC Dismisses Infructuous Pleas
The Madras High Court dismissed decades-old trademark opposition petitions filed by E.I. du Pont as infructuous following the voluntary abandonment of marks.
trademark
Madras HC Enforces ‘ARK PAIN RELIEF SPRAY’ in Medifame Suit
Madras High Court decreed a commercial suit enforcing proprietary trade dress and trademark rights for Apex Laboratories under a binding compromise decree.
trademark
Trademark Squatting on .Bharat and New Domain Extensions: INDRP, Cybersquatting, and Indic Brand Protection
Examines domain squatting risks across .Bharat and multilingual Indic ccTLDs, INDRP dispute resolution procedures, and defense strategies for brand owners in India.
trademark
MS Cafe v Vyom Foodcraft: Delhi HC Rejects Late Evidence
The Delhi High Court rejected an application under Order XI Rule 1(5) CPC to introduce late prior user evidence, holding that internal record misplacement is not reasonable cause.
trademark
Utracon v. Ucon: Delhi HC Refers ‘UTRACON’ Suit to Arbitration
The Delhi High Court referred a post-licence trademark dispute involving 'UTRACON' to arbitration, holding that post-termination brand claims constitute arbitrable rights in personam.
trademark
Sunit Shah v. Jabsons Foods: Delhi HC Protects ‘HOT MIX’ Trademark on Prior Use
The Delhi High Court has reaffirmed that prior continuous use of a trademark grants superior rights over subsequent registration in the namkeen industry. Learn why Section 34 remains a critical tool for protecting established brand identity against infringement.
trademark
‘LEFOXIN BIOX’ vs ‘LANOXIN’: Bombay HC Expunges Junior Mark
The Bombay High Court expunged 'LEFOXIN BIOX' under Section 57, ruling that export manufacturing constitutes statutory trademark use under Section 56(1).