Delhi High Court Restrains ‘ANANTARA’ Mark in Real Estate Dispute
The Delhi High Court issued a permanent summary injunction against the unauthorized use of the 'ANANTARA' mark, citing statutory confusion under Section 29.
Browse every analysis published on Its IP Time.
The Delhi High Court issued a permanent summary injunction against the unauthorized use of the 'ANANTARA' mark, citing statutory confusion under Section 29.
Delhi HC grants permanent injunction for 'KIEHBERG', holding that common law prior user rights supersede subsequent statutory registration under the Trade Marks Act.
Delhi HC rules that appending house marks does not cure structural trademark infringement under Section 29(2)(b) in the Mankind Pharma vs. Alaina Healthcare dispute.
The Bombay High Court refused an interim injunction against a prior user, holding that trademark registration cannot override common law rights under Section 34.
Bombay High Court denied an interim injunction in Nitin Chawla v Sandeep Jape, ruling Section 34 prior continuous use overrides Section 28 registration rights.
The Madras High Court recently expunged a trademark under Sections 47 and 57 of the Trade Marks Act for failure to prove bona fide commercial use in a rectification petition.
The Madras High Court has issued a permanent injunction restraining Petromoney Innovations from using an identical mark, reinforcing trademark protection for financial firms.
The Madras High Court mandates the Registrar of Trade Marks to expedite pending trademark application processing in Healthium Medtech Limited v. Registrar of Trade Marks.
Bombay High Court assesses trade dress infringement in Hindustan Unilever Limited v. AS Print Pack Global Private Limited, emphasizing the evidentiary burden of proof.
The Bombay High Court has granted an interim injunction against Fine and Shine Cosmetic, ruling that near-identical trade dress constitutes trademark infringement.
The Madras HC set aside a patent refusal for Aventose Energy, ruling that the Controller's rejection lacked granular comparative analysis of the claimed invention.
The Bombay High Court confirms Novex Communications' prima facie copyright claim against Gujrat Mineral Development Corporation for unauthorized public performance of music.