Browse every analysis published on Its IP Time.
Analysis of Yes Please Do All Three: Analysis of Japan Tobacco International: Delhi High Court rejects Japan Tobacco's copyright cancellation petition...
Madras HC restores patent application deemed abandoned u/s 21(1) of the Patents Act, 1970 in Deakin University v Controller of Patents under Article 226.
Madras High Court rules Trade Marks Registry cannot refuse renewal fee under Rule 58(3) so long as mark remains on the Register without formal statutory removal.
Madras High Court IPD exercises Section 125(2) Trade Marks Act and Article 226 powers to transfer pending trademark rectification from Registry to High Court.
A doctrinal analysis of how Indian intellectual property law protects video games across distributive layers, from literary software code and audiovisual assets under the Copyright Act, 1957, to patentability hurdles under Sections 3(k) and 3(m).
This weekly Indian IP law digest analyzes critical High Court judgments on trademark territorial jurisdiction, patent expirations, and the CGPDTM GUI design guidelines.
Examining disclosure standards and inventive step thresholds for AI-generated and AI-assisted inventions under Indian patent jurisprudence.
The Gujarat High Court held that a trademark's legal situs is fixed at the statutory registry, preventing state authorities from demanding extraterritorial stamp duty.
Examining whether names of deities and religious symbols can be monopolized as trademarks under Section 9 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Madras High Court upheld an order allowing a trademark infringement plaint amendment to detail business origin and chain of title under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC.
The Madras High Court mandates the Registrar to transfer trademark rectification proceedings to the High Court, bypassing administrative inertia to ensure judicial efficiency.
The Madras High Court dismissed patent revocation challenges as infructuous after confirming that the underlying patent terms had expired, rendering the matter moot.
