Other IP
Semiconductor Layout Design in India: Protection and Registry Guide
Learn how the Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Layout-Design Act 2000 protects chip topology in India through registration, eligibility tests, and enforcement remedies.
Browse the archive
Category: AI & IP
The AI & Emerging IPRs section explores the rapidly evolving intersection of artificial intelligence, computational creativity, and Indian intellectual property jurisprudence. We examine how Indian courts, the Patent Office, and the Copyright Office are addressing novel legal challenges surrounding AI-generated works, inventorship criteria for computer-implemented inventions, training dataset copyright liability, and fair dealing defenses.
Additionally, this hub covers allied IP disciplines including trade secret protection, confidential information, semiconductor layout-designs, and plant variety protection under Indian law.
Other IP
INDRP in India: Domain Name Disputes, Cybersquatting and Bad Faith | Its IP Time
Learn the INDRP framework for resolving domain disputes in India. Master the evidentiary standards for bad faith and protect your trademark from cybersquatting.
Other IP
Shruti Haasan v. Mahalaxmi Arts: Bombay HC Issues AI John Doe Order
The Bombay HC in Shruti Haasan v. Mahalaxmi Arts has issued a landmark John Doe injunction protecting personality rights against unauthorized AI-generated content.
Other IP
Vikrant Kapoor v. Anuj Kohli: Delhi HC Defines Ouster Clause
The Delhi High Court in Vikrant Kapoor v. Anuj Kohli ruled that naming a specific forum in invoices effectively ousts other courts, even without 'exclusive' language.
Other IP
JRPT Automation: Supreme Court Mandates Procedural Fairness
The Supreme Court of India has ruled that courts must ensure procedural fairness by linking contempt applications with pending Order XXXIX Rule 4 applications under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. This landmark directive prevents the premature penalization of litigants when an injunction itself is under challenge. For IP practitioners, this decision underscores the tactical necessity of synchronizing interlocutory proceedings in commercial litigation to ensure that the validity of an injunction is adjudicated before breach proceedings are enforced, ultimately upholding the principle of natural justice in high-stakes commercial disputes.
AI & IP
Zippy vs. Veer Ji: Protecting Factory Footage from Misuse
Passing off in the food industry frequently involves the unauthorized use of proprietary manufacturing footage to misrepresent the quality and source of food products. When a brand showcases a supplier’s factory as its own, it commits actionable misrepresentation that misleads consumers and violates the supplier's commercial goodwill. As demonstrated in the Zippy vs. Veer Ji dispute, courts are increasingly granting urgent injunctions to protect trade secrets and brand reputation, holding platforms accountable for the rapid removal of deceptive marketing content that manufactures false trust among the public.
AI & IP
Anil Kapoor to AI Deepfakes: Personality Rights in India
Indian personality rights have evolved from a constitutional interpretation of Article 21 into a robust, judge-made property framework. Courts now routinely grant John Doe and dynamic injunctions to protect celebrities, medical professionals, and content creators against AI-generated deepfakes and unauthorised commercial use. By synthesizing Copyright Act performer rights with trademark passing-off principles, the Delhi High Court has bridged legislative gaps, offering urgent relief against digital impersonation. This framework serves as a critical shield for protecting reputation, dignity, and commercial goodwill in the rapidly expanding digital landscape.