Weekly Indian IP Digest: Sept 28 to Oct 3, 2026 | Its IP Time
This weekly Indian IP law digest analyzes critical High Court judgments on trademark territorial jurisdiction, patent expirations, and the CGPDTM GUI design guidelines.
Browse the archive
This weekly Indian IP law digest analyzes critical High Court judgments on trademark territorial jurisdiction, patent expirations, and the CGPDTM GUI design guidelines.
Examining disclosure standards and inventive step thresholds for AI-generated and AI-assisted inventions under Indian patent jurisprudence.
The Gujarat High Court held that a trademark's legal situs is fixed at the statutory registry, preventing state authorities from demanding extraterritorial stamp duty.
Examining whether names of deities and religious symbols can be monopolized as trademarks under Section 9 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Madras High Court upheld an order allowing a trademark infringement plaint amendment to detail business origin and chain of title under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC.
The Madras High Court mandates the Registrar to transfer trademark rectification proceedings to the High Court, bypassing administrative inertia to ensure judicial efficiency.
The Madras High Court dismissed patent revocation challenges as infructuous after confirming that the underlying patent terms had expired, rendering the matter moot.
A comprehensive monthly review of September 2026 Indian IP jurisprudence, analyzing 28 landmark rulings across trademarks, patents, copyright, and AI personality rights.
The Madras High Court ruled that IPD Rules do not allow automatic transfer of district court infringement suits to the High Court, prioritizing statutory jurisdiction.
A doctrinal analysis of Section 3(k) of the Patents Act, examining Indian judicial and patent office guidelines on software and computer-related inventions.