Serum Institute v Tengra: Bombay HC Rules on Section 79 IT Act and YouTube Takedown
Bombay HC issues mandatory injunction against X Corp for anti-vax defamation, clarifying Section 79 IT Act intermediary liability and YouTube takedown rules.
Browse the archive
Bombay HC issues mandatory injunction against X Corp for anti-vax defamation, clarifying Section 79 IT Act intermediary liability and YouTube takedown rules.
Analysis of 2 And 3: A comprehensive analysis of traditional knowledge protection under Indian patent law, examining biopiracy prevention, the TKDL...
The Madras High Court has ordered the removal of a conflicting mark from the Register, reinforcing that prior established goodwill prevails over subsequent trademark registration.
Madras High Court clarifies that co-plaintiff partners cannot be transposed as defendants in trademark suits under Order I Rule 10 CPC, affirming Order I Rule 2 safeguards.
Delhi HC resolves Novartis v Novosys trademark suit, enforcing the Cadila public health doctrine and directing cancellation of deceptively similar marks.
Delhi HC Division Bench holds in Umendra Exports v Four Cubes that courts cannot mechanically return composite suits under Order VII Rule 10 without permitting amendment.
A comprehensive legal analysis of trade secret protection in India: TRIPS Article 39, judicial standards in American Express and Anil Gupta, confidentiality clubs, and the 22nd Law Commission Draft Protection of Trade Secrets Bill 2024.
Evaluating the statutory enforcement of Geographical Indications in India and legal strategies for protecting community brand equity.
Discover key Indian IP law developments from Sep 20-26, 2026: Supreme Court Section 134 trademark jurisdiction referral, Madras High Court rulings (MYSOP, Dr. WASH, TARO, Joonus Sait), and DPIIT Ayush patent status report.
The Madras HC refused to grant an interim injunction, holding that retail expansion under a unified GST registration does not violate a trademark litigation status quo order.