trademark
‘LEFOXIN BIOX’ vs ‘LANOXIN’: Bombay HC Expunges Junior Mark
The Bombay High Court expunged 'LEFOXIN BIOX' under Section 57, ruling that export manufacturing constitutes statutory trademark use under Section 56(1).
Browse the archive
Category: trademark
trademark
Supreme Court Consolidates ‘SUPREME’ Trademark Suits in Ahmedabad
The Supreme Court of India transferred and consolidated cross-jurisdictional trademark suits over 'SUPREME' to Ahmedabad under Section 25 CPC to avoid conflicting decrees.
trademark
Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories v. Registrar: Madras HC Sets Aside Trademark Registration Over Deceptive Similarity
Analysis of Any Write Ups: The Madras High Court recently set aside a trademark registration for 'NICE' after finding it deceptively similar to Dr. Reddy’s...
trademark
Bombay HC Restrains ‘Pune Mirror’ Dispute: Rules on Section 124 Delay
Bombay HC dismisses Kothrud Mitra's plea, ruling that failing to challenge trademark validity before trial closes constitutes statutory abandonment under Section 124.
trademark
Karnataka HC Sets Aside Injunction: ‘Section 34’ Protects Prior Users
The Karnataka High Court set aside an interim injunction, ruling that a trademark registration cannot override the common law rights of a bona fide prior user.
trademark
Delhi High Court Restrains ‘ANANTARA’ Mark in Real Estate Dispute
The Delhi High Court issued a permanent summary injunction against the unauthorized use of the 'ANANTARA' mark, citing statutory confusion under Section 29.
trademark
‘KIEHBERG’ Mark: Delhi HC Protects Prior User Against Registrant
Delhi HC grants permanent injunction for 'KIEHBERG', holding that common law prior user rights supersede subsequent statutory registration under the Trade Marks Act.
trademark
Delhi HC Restrains ‘ACNE + SCAR’ Mark in Mankind Pharma Dispute
Delhi HC rules that appending house marks does not cure structural trademark infringement under Section 29(2)(b) in the Mankind Pharma vs. Alaina Healthcare dispute.
trademark
Gaurav Chawla v. Sandeep Jape: Bombay HC Protects Prior User
The Bombay High Court refused an interim injunction against a prior user, holding that trademark registration cannot override common law rights under Section 34.
trademark
Nitin Chawla v Sandeep Jape: Bombay HC Refuses Interim Injunction
Bombay High Court denied an interim injunction in Nitin Chawla v Sandeep Jape, ruling Section 34 prior continuous use overrides Section 28 registration rights.