Nitin Chawla v Sandeep Jape: Bombay HC Refuses Interim Injunction
Bombay High Court denied an interim injunction in Nitin Chawla v Sandeep Jape, ruling Section 34 prior continuous use overrides Section 28 registration rights.
Browse the archive
Bombay High Court denied an interim injunction in Nitin Chawla v Sandeep Jape, ruling Section 34 prior continuous use overrides Section 28 registration rights.
The Madras HC set aside a patent refusal for Aventose Energy, ruling that the Controller's rejection lacked granular comparative analysis of the claimed invention.
The Madras High Court set aside a patent refusal, ruling that the Controller's use of 'hindsight mosaicing' of prior art failed to negate the invention's novelty.
The Bombay High Court refused Novex Communications' injunction plea, ruling that statutory trademark registration cannot override established prior commercial use.
The Bombay High Court denied Hindustan Unilever an injunction, ruling that a registered trademark cannot override documented prior commercial use by a defendant.
An examination of domain name disputes, cybersquatting, and trademark protection under the .IN Registry (INDRP) and WIPO UDRP frameworks, analyzing Reliance Industries Ltd. v. Vicky Sood.
The Madras High Court set aside the refusal of the 'EXPONENT' mark, ruling that Section 11(1) refusals must consider Section 12 exceptions and issue reasoned orders under Section 18(5).
The Madras High Court has dismissed as withdrawn a copyright suit filed by KVN Thespian Films concerning the cinematographic film 'HAIWAAN' against 33 entities.
The Madras High Court allowed the withdrawal of a high-stakes John Doe copyright infringement suit concerning the film 'MANDAADI', ending a 26-ISP blocking bid.
The Madras High Court permitted Vishesh Pictures to withdraw its broad dynamic injunction suit against 33 ISPs, highlighting the fragility of unsubstantiated claims.