Featured analysis
CopyrightCovering Indian Intellectual Property Law
Independent analysis of Indian IP case law, covering patents, trademarks, copyright, designs and geographical indications. Includes IP law guides, Weekly Digests, and Monthly Roundups
Updating live
Latest Indian IP law cases
Bombay High Court
Unilever PLC Vs Manji Patel and Dinesh Patel
Bombay High Court
Godpower Media Private Limited Vs John Does
Bombay High Court
POPAT RAJA And SONS Proprietor Mrs Kumud Hitesh Gutka through POA holder Mr Neel Hitesh Gutk Vs Manji Patel and Dinesh Patel Org Defendant1
Madras High Court
M/S.Sangeetha Caterers and Consultants LLP Vs HOTEL SANGETHAS PURE VEG
Madras High Court
Ospedale San Raffaele S.r.I. Vs Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs
Madras High Court
KOBELCO COMPRESSORS CORPORATION Vs ASSISTANT CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS
Recent reading
Latest analyses
trademark
Unilever v. Tarun Kumar: Bombay HC Enforces Partial Consent Decree
Bombay High Court decrees Unilever's trademark suit against Defendant No. 2 via Consent Terms, ruling that partial settlements in multi-party IP suits do not discharge co-defendants.
trademark
Madras HC Binds Hostinger to Block ‘GALAXYHEALTH’ Domain Squatters
The Madras High Court decreed a commercial suit by binding domain registrar Hostinger to automated keyword filtering against 'GALAXYHEALTH' domain squatters.
patent
Madras HC Sets Aside Kobelco Patent Refusal in Prior Art Dispute
The Madras High Court set aside the refusal of Kobelco's patent application for lack of detailed comparative reasoning under Section 2(1)(ja) of the Patents Act, 1970.
trademark
Madras High Court Sets Aside Section 11 Refusal of ‘ELITE’ Mark
The Madras High Court set aside the Trade Marks Registry's rejection of 'ELITE', holding Section 11(1) refusal premature against prior user and Section 12 claims.
Monthly IP Roundup
Indian IP Law Roundup October 2026: Trademarks, Patents and AI Rights
A comprehensive monthly review of October 2026 Indian IP jurisprudence, analyzing 40 landmark rulings across trademarks, patents, copyright, and AI personality rights.
Weekly IP Digest
Weekly Indian IP Law Digest Oct 25 to 31 2026 | Its IP Time
Weekly Indian IP Law Digest reviewing mandatory evidence timelines under Rule 45, patent term expiry under Section 53, and key High Court trademark injunctions.
trademark
Delhi HC Restrains ‘VEEPRO’ Mark for Infringing ‘WIPRO’ Trademark
The Delhi High Court has issued a permanent injunction against VEEPRO Lights, ruling that the mark deceptively infringes upon Wipro Enterprises' registered mark.
trademark
Delhi High Court Restores ‘KEI-KUMAR EQUIPMENT INDIA’ Trademark
The Delhi High Court set aside a trademark review order restoring 'KEI-KUMAR EQUIPMENT INDIA', holding Rule 45 abandonment mandatory and immune to advocate negligence claims.
patent
Madras HC Dismisses Patent Appeal: Expiry Renders Monopoly Moot
The Madras High Court dismissed an appeal regarding a patent refusal, ruling it infructuous as the statutory twenty-year term under Section 53 had already elapsed.
A weekly essential
Weekly IP Digest
The developments worth knowing about, curated for a busy legal mind.
Explore the seriesThe month in view
Monthly IP Roundup
A considered record of the rulings, reforms, and conversations that shaped the month.
Explore the seriesBuild your foundation