Browse the archive
The Madras High Court affirmed the exclusive rights of the registered proprietor of 'PREETHI HOSPITALS' while clarifying the procedural limits of reopening interlocutory injunctions.
The Delhi HC dismissed an appeal by Conqueror Innovations against Xiaomi, ruling that the 'Find Device' feature lacks essential patent elements and citing a nine-year delay.
Learn how the Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Layout-Design Act 2000 protects chip topology in India through registration, eligibility tests, and enforcement remedies.
The Madras High Court has upheld an ex-parte injunction protecting the 'GLOBE' trademark, ruling that a 'proposed to be used' declaration in a defendant's application fatally undermines subsequent claims of prior user status.
Learn the INDRP framework for resolving domain disputes in India. Master the evidentiary standards for bad faith and protect your trademark from cybersquatting.
This week features landmark rulings on trademark trade dress, patent examination rights, and AI-driven personality rights across the Delhi, Bombay, and Madras High Courts.
The Bombay HC in Shruti Haasan v. Mahalaxmi Arts has issued a landmark John Doe injunction protecting personality rights against unauthorized AI-generated content.
The Madras High Court ruled that an interim injunction cannot be granted in copyright disputes where the chain of title is contested and plagued by rival claims.
The Delhi High Court has set aside a patent refusal, ruling that the Controller cannot consolidate Section 14 examination rights with Section 25 opposition hearings.
The Delhi High Court in Hindustan Unilever v. Kwick Living settles territorial jurisdiction by leveraging defendant admissions, ensuring expedited interim relief adjudication.
