Ramji Lal Agarwal v. Sourav Agarwal: Calcutta HC Affirms Suit Scope
Calcutta HC confirms a dispute over family settlement terms is maintainable as a commercial suit, rejecting a procedural shift to the IPR Division.
Browse every analysis published on Its IP Time.
Calcutta HC confirms a dispute over family settlement terms is maintainable as a commercial suit, rejecting a procedural shift to the IPR Division.
An analysis of India's Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Layout-Design Act (SICLD Act 2000), examining why layout-design registrations remain low despite the India Semiconductor Mission and exploring domestic IP ownership.
The Bombay HC denied an injunction to Asian Paints, ruling that Section 28 registration rights are qualified by Section 34 common law protections for prior users.
An analysis of database protection under Indian intellectual property law, examining the EBC v. Modak originality threshold, contractual mechanisms, web scraping, and the debate on sui generis rights.
The Madras High Court resolved the TMY Products LLC trademark dispute by decreeing the suit in terms of a private settlement, avoiding a full trial on merits.
The Madras High Court mandates advertisement of 'THE SKIN COMPANY' mark, censuring the Trademark Registry for issuing generic, non-reasoned refusal orders.
An analysis of character merchandising under Indian law, examining copyright protection for fictional personas, Star India v. Leo Burnett, celebrity personality rights, and Section 37 broadcast rights.
Get expert analysis of landmark rulings on patent abandonment, prior user rights under Section 34, and deepfakes alongside new CGPDTM guidelines.
The Madras High Court recently dismissed a trademark infringement suit via summary judgment, signaling a shift in how Indian courts handle weak IP claims under Order XIII-A.
The Madras High Court dismissed an infringement suit against 'Amul TRU' via summary judgment. It found 'TRUE VALLEY' had no prospect of success, preventing a meritless trial.
The Madras High Court dismissed Asian Beverage's infringement suit against Amul for failing to issue mandatory pre-institution notice under the Gujarat Act.
The Madras High Court modified an ex-parte interim injunction, limiting its scope to prevent trademark confusion on spices while protecting the defendant's snack business.